Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maria Bondarenko vs Emily Welker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bondarenko vs Welker analysis and find out who is favored!
Maria Bondarenko vs Emily Welker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bondarenko 1 - 0 Welker
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bondarenko has won 35.9% of points on their second serve, while Welker has won 38.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bondarenko, in recent form, has won 54.61% of their opponent's second serve points, while Welker has won 56.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.11% and 45.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bondarenko has saved 38.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Welker has saved 42.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bondarenko has won 50% of matches played (W/L 23/ 23), with Welker winning 57.14% (W/L 24/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bondarenko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 62/ 43), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 24/ 34). Welker has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 43/ 42).
- Player level: In the last year, Bondarenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 22/ 22), where as Welker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 18/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bondarenko winning 1 times and Welker being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bondarenko winning 2 and Welker winning 0. The last match between Bondarenko and Welker was at the W25 Verbier, 23-08-2022, First, Clay with Maria Bondarenko getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:18:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bondarenko and Welker have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bondarenko winning 0 times and Welker 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bondarenko winning 0, and Welker 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bondarenko has played against opponents with an average rank of 253.37 while Welker has played against players with an average rank of 186.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bondarenko has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Welker has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bondarenko has converted 34.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Welker has converted 48.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
392
Rank
304
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
832
Rank
593
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
52% (103-96)
Career Total W/L
54% (116-97)
14% (1-6)
YTD W/L
56% (5-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bondarenko VS Welker H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Maria Bondarenko | Emily Welker |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:18:0 | 2:18:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (37/76) | 70% (55/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (28/37) | 47% (26/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (16/39) | 50% (12/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (41/79) | 42% (32/76) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Bondarenko VS Welker H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Maria Bondarenko
Player
Emily Welker
49%
(
37 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
4
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maria Bondarenko | Emily Welker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 14% (1/6) | 56% (5/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 14% (2/12) | 57% (12/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 32% (36/78) | 50% (103/101) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 71% (5/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 25 | 20 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:2:34 | 2:9:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 309.14 | 223.44 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (138/250) | 74% (498/673) |
| 1st Serve W% | 49% (67/138) | 53% (262/498) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 30% (34/112) | 39% (68/175) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (8/24) | 49% (53/109) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (96/258) | 49% (344/698) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 56% (5/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 14% (1/7) | 56% (5/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 25% (4/1) |
Maria Bondarenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mina Hodzic
Player
Maria Bondarenko
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
49%
(
18 of
37)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
8 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
49
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Maria Bondarenko
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrienn Nagy
Player
Maria Bondarenko
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Maria Bondarenko
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Anderson
Player
Maria Bondarenko
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Maria Bondarenko
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Bondarenko
Player
Chiraz Bechri
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Anderson
Player
Maria Bondarenko
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Emily Welker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Maria Ionescu
Player
Emily Welker
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Eva Maria Ionescu
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Nikol Rivkin
77%
(
72 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
71 of
95)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Georgia Andreea Craciun
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Bianca Elena Barbulescu
77%
(
68 of
88)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Welker
Player
Valerija Maija Kargina
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayu Crossley
Player
Emily Welker
79%
(
92 of
116)
1st Serve %
85%
(
107 of
126)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
46 of
92)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
42%
(
10 of
24)
Break Points Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
58 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
68 of
126)
126
Total Points Won
116
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
Player
Emily Welker
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
Player
Emily Welker
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
3
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
58 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Emily Welker
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bondarenko Vs Welker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
